!!c1QfXUgcGY0

Oh no.

Oh no!

Oh no!!

Oh no!!!

4:52pm | author:

For my 26th birthday I deleted my G+ account.

3:34pm | author:
syntaxcoloring:

plaintextoffenders:

sprint.com
Telecommunications
Sprint sends everything you need to take over an account in plaintext: your PIN and security question/answer!



"Gosh why do all these big companies keep getting hacked"

syntaxcoloring:

plaintextoffenders:

sprint.com

Telecommunications

Sprint sends everything you need to take over an account in plaintext: your PIN and security question/answer!

!

"Gosh why do all these big companies keep getting hacked"

9:48am | author:

Anonymous said: you said your birthday is next sat on twitter but you didn't say what your address is?

Thanks for asking this anonymously, so I can’t answer privately.

But it’s cool, you can just send the box of dildos to me at work:

Sam Bierwagen
Robot Mesh
11251 120TH AVE NE STE 217
KIRKLAND WA 98033

Don’t send me a furry pride shirt, though, I already got one for myself.

5:55pm | author:
binary-helix:

rasputinstuff:

montodebon:

nowyoukno:

Sourcefor more facts follow NowYouKno

The key word here is “radioactive”
Do not drive with radiation a few feet in front of you
Do not drive with radiation a few feet in front of you
Also… Do not drive with radiation a few feet in front of you.
This has been a PSA
If you checked the source for information you’d know the radiation it gives off is incredibly weak. It can be stopped with a single sheet of aluminum foil. So unless the engine’s in the passenger seat, you’ll be fine.

Radiation is bad for you in large doses. A lot of things give off small amounts of radiation that won’t hurt you such as phones, TVs, microwaves, computers, etc.

people not understanding radiation and insisting that all radiation ever is unnatural and bad makes me sad. please do your research.

Man oh man do I love Tumblr.
Alright, we’ve got a lot of ground to cover with this one. Go get some coffee.
One of the Critical Life Skills on the internet is the ability to estimate the reputability of a source at a glance. You need to be able to quickly sum up something and decide if it’s nonsensical garbage.
For instance, here’s the header of the “source” that nowyoukno cites:

Hmm.
And here’s a video that tatoott1009 did about the car, if you want to listen to a schizophrenic redneck ramble for half an hour.
A question you might have now, after letting the video play for five seconds and then closing the tab, is “What’s this dude got against the Act of 1871?”
Well, he’ll tell you, by way of an infowars.com article:

“Then, by passing the Act of 1871, Congress formed a corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, shoved the organic version of the Constitution aside by changing the word ‘for’ to ‘of’ in the title. Let me explain: the original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers read: ‘The Constitution for the united states of America.’ [note that neither the words ‘united’ nor ‘states’ began with capital letters] But the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’ is a corporate constitution, which is absolutely NOT the same document you think it is. First of all, it ended all our rights of sovereignty [Sui Juris]. So you now have the HOW, how the international bankers got their hands on THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.”

"International bankers" is the standard dogwhistle phrasing for “jews”, by the way. And look, he’s also discovered the secret behind 9/11! Wow! Is nowyoukno going to do a post about how the Rothschilds did WTC, now, too?
But enough beating on an internet psycho, he’s certainly got enough problems already. I put scare quotes around source up there because this is just a plagiarized copy of a mashable.com article from 2013. It doesn’t have any more information, and doesn’t make any more sense, since mashable is garbage. No, we’ve got to go to the real source: laserpowersystems.com. And what a site it is!

I was having fun writing this post, right up until I started trying to read laserpowersystems.com.
I’ll tell ya, this guy really sincerely believes in his idea, which may or may not be nonsense. I can’t actually tell you what it is though, because he’s apparently terrified to put it down in print, just in case the Rothschilds steal it. It’s got something to do with firing a beam of electrons using a laser wakefield accelerator into a block of thorium, and then… power is produced somehow? Which won’t happen, of course, since that’ll just coat the inside of your vacuum chamber with a film of thorium due to sputtering, and induce some fierce bremsstrahlung x-ray emission, (which certainly won’t be stopped by a sheet of aluminum foil!) but induce no actual fission events…
The mockup graphics all over the site look a lot like RTGs, which:
Can’t put out enough power to run a car (~100W)
Can’t be fueled by thorium
Are super expensive
Depending on the design, have a useful lifetime of only 10-30 years.
Pretty inefficient in their use of fissile materials, much worse than a conventional fission reactor.
This guy is kinda piggybacking on the proposed thorium fuel cycle, a real actual idea which laserpowersystems.com smears by mere association. But, oh well.
As for the people defending radiation in the reblogs above..
Let’s make sure we’re all on the same page:

Radiation is electromagnetic radiation, photons. The farther up the spectrum you go, the more of a punch each individual photon has. When you stand in the sunlight, you’re soaking up thousands of watts of radiation from the giant uncontrolled nuclear reactor our planet orbits. ELF photos are harmless, gamma ray photons are unambiguously dangerous, and kill you. Gamma rays are bad because they’re ionizing radiation: they’re so hot that they smash molecules apart when they smack into them. Ultraviolet light isn’t ionizing radiation, but it still has enough energy to cause photochemical reactions in your skin, and most importantly, your DNA, thus the popularity of skin cancer among baby boomers.
The line at where photochemical effects can definitively said not to happen is wide and fuzzy, and where lots of arguing takes place.
(Any given photochemical effect has a hard threshold beyond which is doesn’t take place: the theory behind this is what Einstein got his first Nobel for in 1921. If a photochemical reaction requires a 420nm photon, then a 430nm photon won’t do anything at all, even if you use millions of watts of them. But while a single reaction is clear and obvious, ruling out all photochemical reactions in a big complex system, like the human body, is hard-bordering-on-impossible.)
(I doubt that cell phone radiation is going to do much of anything that the internal black-body radiation of a warm body isn’t going to do. If our brain proteins are so fragile that they can’t handle 10^11Hz photons, then our own 10^12Hz photons would have cooked them long since.)
So saying that “radiation isn’t bad for you in small doses”[1] is excluding rather a lot of context, isn’t it.
—-
1: I would be remiss if I did not mention the radiation hormesis hypothesis here.

binary-helix:

rasputinstuff:

montodebon:

nowyoukno:

Sourcefor more facts follow NowYouKno

The key word here is “radioactive”

Do not drive with radiation a few feet in front of you

Do not drive with radiation a few feet in front of you

Also… Do not drive with radiation a few feet in front of you.

This has been a PSA

If you checked the source for information you’d know the radiation it gives off is incredibly weak. It can be stopped with a single sheet of aluminum foil. So unless the engine’s in the passenger seat, you’ll be fine.

Radiation is bad for you in large doses. A lot of things give off small amounts of radiation that won’t hurt you such as phones, TVs, microwaves, computers, etc.

people not understanding radiation and insisting that all radiation ever is unnatural and bad makes me sad. please do your research.

Man oh man do I love Tumblr.

Alright, we’ve got a lot of ground to cover with this one. Go get some coffee.

One of the Critical Life Skills on the internet is the ability to estimate the reputability of a source at a glance. You need to be able to quickly sum up something and decide if it’s nonsensical garbage.

For instance, here’s the header of the “source” that nowyoukno cites:

image

Hmm.

And here’s a video that tatoott1009 did about the car, if you want to listen to a schizophrenic redneck ramble for half an hour.

A question you might have now, after letting the video play for five seconds and then closing the tab, is “What’s this dude got against the Act of 1871?”

Well, he’ll tell you, by way of an infowars.com article:

“Then, by passing the Act of 1871, Congress formed a corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, shoved the organic version of the Constitution aside by changing the word ‘for’ to ‘of’ in the title. Let me explain: the original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers read: ‘The Constitution for the united states of America.’ [note that neither the words ‘united’ nor ‘states’ began with capital letters] But the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’ is a corporate constitution, which is absolutely NOT the same document you think it is. First of all, it ended all our rights of sovereignty [Sui Juris]. So you now have the HOW, how the international bankers got their hands on THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.”

"International bankers" is the standard dogwhistle phrasing for “jews”, by the way. And look, he’s also discovered the secret behind 9/11! Wow! Is nowyoukno going to do a post about how the Rothschilds did WTC, now, too?

But enough beating on an internet psycho, he’s certainly got enough problems already. I put scare quotes around source up there because this is just a plagiarized copy of a mashable.com article from 2013. It doesn’t have any more information, and doesn’t make any more sense, since mashable is garbage. No, we’ve got to go to the real source: laserpowersystems.com. And what a site it is!

image

I was having fun writing this post, right up until I started trying to read laserpowersystems.com.

I’ll tell ya, this guy really sincerely believes in his idea, which may or may not be nonsense. I can’t actually tell you what it is though, because he’s apparently terrified to put it down in print, just in case the Rothschilds steal it. It’s got something to do with firing a beam of electrons using a laser wakefield accelerator into a block of thorium, and then… power is produced somehow? Which won’t happen, of course, since that’ll just coat the inside of your vacuum chamber with a film of thorium due to sputtering, and induce some fierce bremsstrahlung x-ray emission, (which certainly won’t be stopped by a sheet of aluminum foil!) but induce no actual fission events…

The mockup graphics all over the site look a lot like RTGs, which:

  1. Can’t put out enough power to run a car (~100W)
  2. Can’t be fueled by thorium
  3. Are super expensive
  4. Depending on the design, have a useful lifetime of only 10-30 years.
  5. Pretty inefficient in their use of fissile materials, much worse than a conventional fission reactor.

This guy is kinda piggybacking on the proposed thorium fuel cycle, a real actual idea which laserpowersystems.com smears by mere association. But, oh well.

As for the people defending radiation in the reblogs above..

Let’s make sure we’re all on the same page:

image

Radiation is electromagnetic radiation, photons. The farther up the spectrum you go, the more of a punch each individual photon has. When you stand in the sunlight, you’re soaking up thousands of watts of radiation from the giant uncontrolled nuclear reactor our planet orbits. ELF photos are harmless, gamma ray photons are unambiguously dangerous, and kill you. Gamma rays are bad because they’re ionizing radiation: they’re so hot that they smash molecules apart when they smack into them. Ultraviolet light isn’t ionizing radiation, but it still has enough energy to cause photochemical reactions in your skin, and most importantly, your DNA, thus the popularity of skin cancer among baby boomers.

The line at where photochemical effects can definitively said not to happen is wide and fuzzy, and where lots of arguing takes place.

(Any given photochemical effect has a hard threshold beyond which is doesn’t take place: the theory behind this is what Einstein got his first Nobel for in 1921. If a photochemical reaction requires a 420nm photon, then a 430nm photon won’t do anything at all, even if you use millions of watts of them. But while a single reaction is clear and obvious, ruling out all photochemical reactions in a big complex system, like the human body, is hard-bordering-on-impossible.)

(I doubt that cell phone radiation is going to do much of anything that the internal black-body radiation of a warm body isn’t going to do. If our brain proteins are so fragile that they can’t handle 10^11Hz photons, then our own 10^12Hz photons would have cooked them long since.)

So saying that “radiation isn’t bad for you in small doses”[1] is excluding rather a lot of context, isn’t it.

—-

1: I would be remiss if I did not mention the radiation hormesis hypothesis here.

(via karloaf)

9:50pm | author:
"Inside a TTL Logic IC"

Since 2014 is generally considered the 50th anniversary of TTL logic, I thought I’d take a TTL logic chip apart and do a little analysis.
So I started with a DM7438N, lot code M:P9006Y. Looking at National Semiconductor’s device marking convention document, I take this to mean that it was manufactured in week 6 of 1990 at a subcontractor’s fab in the United States and assembled in Malaysia.
The 7438 is a quad 2-input NAND buffer with open-collector outputs. That means the die should look symmetrical to a degree.
To take it apart, I used a rotary tool to carve out the encapsulation material on the top and the bottom, and then picked at it with side cutters until the chip fell out. Sadly I cracked off a corner of the die including one bond pad, but it’s still possible to figure out how it works.
[…]

"Inside a TTL Logic IC"

Since 2014 is generally considered the 50th anniversary of TTL logic, I thought I’d take a TTL logic chip apart and do a little analysis.

So I started with a DM7438N, lot code M:P9006Y. Looking at National Semiconductor’s device marking convention document, I take this to mean that it was manufactured in week 6 of 1990 at a subcontractor’s fab in the United States and assembled in Malaysia.

The 7438 is a quad 2-input NAND buffer with open-collector outputs. That means the die should look symmetrical to a degree.

To take it apart, I used a rotary tool to carve out the encapsulation material on the top and the bottom, and then picked at it with side cutters until the chip fell out. Sadly I cracked off a corner of the die including one bond pad, but it’s still possible to figure out how it works.

[…]

9:02pm | author:

zarla-s:

thanks for the worst hoodie in the entire world c1qfxugcgy0, i will wear it never

Happy birthday!

6:45am | author:

Tumblr is going to scan your photos for the brand logos they contain

deckerantagonist:

And then sell that information to the corporations who own the brands.

Investor storytime in action.

(via webinarfantastic)

6:10pm | author:
foldingcookie replied to your post:reviews 5
I was also an adherent of the propaganda/garbage dichotomy but then after reading tor.com/stories… I realized it had been written by Doctorow and I was hella baffled

Huh, that’s not bad. I’m getting the feeling that Cory got halfway through it before realizing that he was going to have to write an ending, though.

Spoilers: Vs jr jrer fhccbfrq gb oryvrir gung Yrba, nqiregvfvat nppbhag rkrphgvir, jnf nyfb n cunezprhgvpny purzvfg jub znantrq gb trg n cflpuvngevp zrqvpngvba nyy gur jnl vagb pyvavpny gevnyf, gura znantr gb xvyy gur qeht fb rssrpgviryl gung yvgrenyyl abobql ryfr va gur jbeyq rira unq n pbcl bs gur zbyrphyne fgehpgher; gura ur ernyyl arrqrq gb fcraq zber gvzr frggvat gung hc rneyvre va gur fgbel, engure guna fcevatvat vg ba hf ng gur raq.

8:01pm | author:

There is no satire as awful as reality itself.

(From The Path Between the Seas: The Creation of the Panama Canal, 1870-1914 by David McCullough)

(Source: Wikipedia)

7:50pm | author:

reviews 5

So, now that I have a smartphone, I’ve been buying and reading ebooks. Thus,

Equoid, The Rhesus Chart, Neptune’s Brood by Charles Stross. (2011, 2013, 2014)

I wonder if I’m too familiar with Stross to actually enjoy his books anymore. I subscribe to his blog, so I tend to see ideas for his books being workshopped and ironed out. By the time the book is actually published I’m real, real familiar with the ideas and themes in it. That means the books have to make it based on the merit of the plot, execution and dialogue, areas where Stross has historically been weak, and actively seems to be getting weaker as time passes.

Equoid was okay, but The Rhesus Chart fumbled the climax badly, and Neptune’s Brood suffered from just being Boring As Shit.

The Yiddish Policeman’s Union by Michael Chabon. (2007)

I couldn’t figure out why the average score on this book was so low, until I read the ending, at which point I was enlightened.

This Book Is Full of Spiders: Seriously, Dude, Don’t Touch It by David Wong. (2013) Some pacing issues, but otherwise great.

Spoilers: Gur Funqbj Zra ner fubja gb or nyy-cbjreshy, pna bcrengr bhgfvqr bs gvzr, naq ernyyl ernyyl ungr uhznaf. Vs gurl’er fb onqnff, gura ubj vf vg gung Jbat xrrcf xvpxvat gurve nff?

Nyfb, va gur svefg unys bs gur obbx Jbat zragvbaf ercrngrqyl gung gur anzr bs gur pvgl, “Haqvfpybfrq”, vf haqvfpybfrq orpnhfr vg’f n fuvgubyr shyy bs qrzbaf, naq lbh qba’g jnag gb tb gurer naljurer. Ohg gur frpbaq unys vf nobhg n mbzovr bhgoernx gung xvyyf gubhfnaqf, naq vf rkcyvpvgyl fnvq gb or yrnqvat arjf ba PAA sbe jrrxf. Pnyyvat gur gbja “Haqvfpybfrq” vf yvxr qbvat n obbx nobhg 9/11 naq ershfvat gb zragvba Arj Lbex ol anzr.

Homeland by Cory Doctorow. (2013)

You can divide all of Cory’s works into two groups: Garbage (Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom, and Someone Comes to Town, Someone Leaves Town) and EFF Propaganda. (Eastern Standard Tribe, Little Brother, For The Win, Makers, etc etc) Homeland is among the latter.

Cory managed to publish a book about Snowden a couple months before Snowden actually leaked anything, which was amazing timing.

The most interesting thing about the book is the juxtaposition of these two passages.

image

image

and

image

If Cory wants us to take him seriously as an arbiter of coolness, then he needs to pull his mouth off Wil Wheaton’s dick for two seconds.

2:20pm | author:

kojimaisalright:

alpha-beta-gamer:

Screencheat is a two to four player first-person shooter where everyone is invisible and the only way to eliminate your enemy or win the match is by screen cheating - as in looking at your enemies side of the screen to know where they are and hunting them down.

Screencheat is certainly a unique FPS in today’s gaming world where every shooter is almost of the same concept but with a different theme to them. Taking inspirations from classic competitive FPS games like Goldeneye, Perfect Dark, and Halo, it’s looking to be an extremely fun and competitive game with a big (invisible) twist.

Sign-Up for the Beta

I can’t believe we are getting to the era of post-genres in gaming

What’s post-RTS going to be, you can only build your opponents units?

Either way i’m interested in where people can take them

(via vappy)

12:53pm | author:

Just a reminder

cabbagebot:

We’re still chilling in irc.freenode.net #tumblrcode

I’m there too.

6:00pm | author:
syntaxcoloring:

plaintextoffenders:

themanaworld.org
MMORPG
What!
Editor’s Note: What!

What!

syntaxcoloring:

plaintextoffenders:

themanaworld.org

MMORPG

What!

Editor’s Note: What!

What!

1:28pm | author:

image

image

image

boom

3:21pm | author:
(Notes:6)
Filed under:facebook